

The object of the game for the interrogator is to determine which of the other two is the man and which is the woman. The interrogator stays in a room apart from the other two.

It is played with three people, a man (A), a woman (B), and an interrogator (C) who may be of either sex. The new form of the problem can be described in terms of a game which we call the Turing defined the game in Computing Machinary and Intelligence (1950) as the following: The Imitation Game (also called the Turing Test) is a contest of equivalence, where an interrogator interacting with a human and a machine - or a computer - is challenged to distinguish between the two.

For example, what would a computer have to do in order for an observer to be convinced that is it actually thinking and thus intelligent?Īlan Turing decided to rephrase the question and instead proposed a distinct criterion for deciding if a computing machine could think. In most cases, the classical question of AI is phrased as follows: Can a computer think? While this question is deeper and more metaphysical than it first appears, it is rather abstract and is difficult to answer precisely. We will also explore some of Turing's refutations of these criticisms and the vision the famous computer scientist had for AI. In this article, we will delve into Alan Turing's famous game and explore some of the many critiques and rebuttals to this famous experiment. Foremost among these concepts is the Imitation Game.

From the mind-boggling computational power of modern graphics processors to the early phases of 5G, the Utopia dream of seeing AI play a role in daily life is nearly a reality.Įven with this evolution in technology, AI continues to root itself in some of the veteran laws and concepts developed in the 20th century. While AI is not a new concept, the advancements of modern technology have finally progressed to the point where practical AI is possible. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become one of the most discussed software concepts in the past few years and its influence has seeped into casual conversations.
